CompTIA PT0-002 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Planning and Scoping - 15%
Explain the importance of planning for an engagement.	- Understanding the target audience - Rules of engagement - Communication escalation path - Resources and requirements Confidentiality of findings Known vs. unknown - Budget - Impact analysis and remediation timelines - Disclaimers Point-in-time assessment Comprehensiveness - Technical constraints - Support resources WSDL/WADL SOAP project file SDK documentation Swagger document XSD Sample application requests Architectural diagrams
Explain key legal concepts.	- Contracts SOW MSA NDA - Environmental differences Export restrictions Local and national government restrictions Corporate policies - Written authorization Obtain signature from proper signing authority Third-party provider authorization when necessary
Explain the importance of scoping an engagement properly.	- Types of assessment Goals-based/objectives-based Compliance-based Red team - Special scoping considerations Premerger Supply chain - Target selection Targets 1. Internal - On-site vs. off-site 2. External 3. First-party vs. third-party hosted 4. Physical 5. Users 6. SSIDs 7. Applications Considerations 1. White-listed vs. black-listed 2. Security exceptions - IPS/WAF whitelist - NAC - Certificate pinning - Company’s policies - Strategy Black box vs. white box vs. gray box - Risk acceptance - Tolerance to impact - Scheduling - Scope creep - Threat actors Adversary tier 1. APT 2. Script kiddies 3. Hacktivist 4. Insider threat Capabilities Intent Threat models
Explain the key aspects of compliance-based assessments.	- Compliance-based assessments, limitations and caveats Rules to complete assessment Password policies Data isolation Key management Limitations 1. Limited network access 2. Limited storage access - Clearly defined objectives based on regulations
Information Gathering and Vulnerability Identification - 22%
Given a scenario, conduct information gathering using appropriate techniques.	- Scanning - Enumeration Hosts Networks Domains Users Groups Network shares Web pages Applications Services Tokens Social networking sites - Packet crafting - Packet inspection - Fingerprinting - Cryptography Certificate inspection - Eavesdropping RF communication monitoring Sniffing 1. Wired 2. Wireless - Decompilation - Debugging - Open Source Intelligence Gathering Sources of research 1. CERT 2. NIST 3. JPCERT 4. CAPEC 5. Full disclosure 6. CVE 7. CWE
Given a scenario, perform a vulnerability scan.	- Credentialed vs. non-credentialed - Types of scans Discovery scan Full scan Stealth scan Compliance scan - Container security - Application scan Dynamic vs. static analysis - Considerations of vulnerability scanning Time to run scans Protocols used Network topology Bandwidth limitations Query throttling Fragile systems/non-traditional assets
Given a scenario, analyze vulnerability scan results.	- Asset categorization - Adjudication False positives - Prioritization of vulnerabilities - Common themes Vulnerabilities Observations Lack of best practices
Explain the process of leveraging information to prepare for exploitation.	- Map vulnerabilities to potential exploits - Prioritize activities in preparation for penetration test - Describe common techniques to complete attack Cross-compiling code Exploit modification Exploit chaining Proof-of-concept development (exploit development) Social engineering Credential brute forcing Dictionary attacks Rainbow tables Deception
Explain weaknesses related to specialized systems.	- ICS - SCADA - Mobile - IoT - Embedded - Point-of-sale system - Biometrics - Application containers - RTOS
Attacks and Exploits - 30%
Compare and contrast social engineering attacks.	- Phishing Spear phishing SMS phishing Voice phishing Whaling - Elicitation Business email compromise - Interrogation - Impersonation - Shoulder surfing - USB key drop - Motivation techniques Authority Scarcity Social proof Urgency Likeness Fear
Given a scenario, exploit network-based vulnerabilities.	- Name resolution exploits NETBIOS name service LLMNR - SMB exploits - SNMP exploits - SMTP exploits - FTP exploits - DNS cache poisoning - Pass the hash - Man-in-the-middle ARP spoofing Replay Relay SSL stripping Downgrade - DoS/stress test - NAC bypass - VLAN hopping
Given a scenario, exploit wireless and RF-based vulnerabilities.	- Evil twin Karma attack Downgrade attack - Deauthentication attacks - Fragmentation attacks - Credential harvesting - WPS implementation weakness - Bluejacking - Bluesnarfing - RFID cloning - Jamming - Repeating
Given a scenario, exploit application-based vulnerabilities.	- Injections SQL HTML Command Code - Authentication Credential brute forcing Session hijacking Redirect Default credentials Weak credentials Kerberos exploits - Authorization Parameter pollution Insecure direct object reference - Cross-site scripting (XSS) Stored/persistent Reflected DOM - Cross-site request forgery (CSRF/XSRF) - Clickjacking - Security misconfiguration Directory traversal Cookie manipulation - File inclusion Local Remote - Unsecure code practices Comments in source code Lack of error handling Overly verbose error handling Hard-coded credentials Race conditions Unauthorized use of functions/unprotected APIs Hidden elements 1. Sensitive information in the DOM Lack of code signing
Given a scenario, exploit local host vulnerabilities.	- OS vulnerabilities Windows Mac OS Linux Android iOS - Unsecure service and protocol configurations - Privilege escalation Linux-specific 1. SUID/SGID programs 2. Unsecure SUDO 3. Ret2libc 4. Sticky bits Windows-specific 1. Cpassword 2. Clear text credentials in LDAP 3. Kerberoasting 4. Credentials in LSASS 5. Unattended installation 6. SAM database 7. DLL hijacking Exploitable services 1. Unquoted service paths 2. Writable services Unsecure file/folder permissions Keylogger Scheduled tasks Kernel exploits - Default account settings - Sandbox escape Shell upgrade VM Container - Physical device security Cold boot attack JTAG debug Serial console
Summarize physical security attacks related to facilities.	- Piggybacking/tailgating - Fence jumping - Dumpster diving - Lock picking - Lock bypass - Egress sensor - Badge cloning
Given a scenario, perform post-exploitation techniques.	- Lateral movement RPC/DCOM 1. PsExec 2. WMI 3. Scheduled tasks PS remoting/WinRM SMB RDP Apple Remote Desktop VNC X-server forwarding Telnet SSH RSH/Rlogin - Persistence Scheduled jobs Scheduled tasks Daemons Back doors Trojan New user creation - Covering your tracks
Penetration Testing Tools - 17%
Given a scenario, use Nmap to conduct information gathering exercises.	- SYN scan (-sS) vs. full connect scan (-sT) - Port selection (-p) - Service identification (-sV) - OS fingerprinting (-O) - Disabling ping (-Pn) - Target input file (-iL) - Timing (-T) - Output parameters oA oN oG oX
Compare and contrast various use cases of tools.	- Use cases Reconnaissance Enumeration Vulnerability scanning Credential attacks 1. Offline password cracking 2. Brute-forcing services Persistence Configuration compliance Evasion Decompilation Forensics Debugging Software assurance 1. Fuzzing 2. SAST 3. DAST - Tools Scanners 1. Nikto 2. OpenVAS 3. SQLmap 4. Nessus Credential testing tools 1. Hashcat 2. Medusa 3. Hydra 4. Cewl 5. John the Ripper 6. Cain and Abel 7. Mimikatz 8. Patator 9. Dirbuster 10. W3AF Debuggers 1. OLLYDBG 2. Immunity debugger 3. GDB 4. WinDBG 5. IDA Software assurance 1. Findbugs/findsecbugs 2. Peach 3. AFL 4. SonarQube 5. YASCA OSINT 1. Whois 2. Nslookup 3. Foca 4. Theharvester 5. Shodan 6. Maltego 7. Recon-NG 8. Censys Wireless 1. Aircrack-NG 2. Kismet 3. WiFite Web proxies 1. OWASP ZAP 2. Burp Suite Social engineering tools 1. SET 2. BeEF Remote access tools 1. SSH 2. NCAT 3. NETCAT 4. Proxychains Networking tools 1. Wireshark 2. Hping Mobile tools 1. Drozer 2. APKX 3. APK studio MISC 1. Searchsploit 2. Powersploit 3. Responder 4. Impacket 5. Empire 6. Metasploit framework
Given a scenario, analyze tool output or data related to a penetration test.	- Password cracking - Pass the hash - Setting up a bind shell - Getting a reverse shell - Proxying a connection - Uploading a web shell - Injections
Given a scenario, analyze a basic script (limited to Bash, Python, Ruby, and PowerShell).	- Logic Looping Flow control - I/O File vs. terminal vs. network - Substitutions - Variables - Common operations String operations Comparisons - Error handling - Arrays - Encoding/decoding
Reporting and Communication - 16%
Given a scenario, use report writing and handling best practices.	- Normalization of data - Written report of findings and remediation Executive summary Methodology Findings and remediation Metrics and measures 1. Risk rating Conclusion - Risk appetite - Storage time for report - Secure handling and disposition of reports
Explain post-report delivery activities.	- Post-engagement cleanup Removing shells Removing tester-created credentials Removing tools - Client acceptance - Lessons learned - Follow-up actions/retest - Attestation of findings
Given a scenario, recommend mitigation strategies for discovered vulnerabilities.	- Solutions People Process Technology - Findings Shared local administrator credentials Weak password complexity Plain text passwords No multifactor authentication SQL injection Unnecessary open services - Remediation Randomize credentials/LAPS Minimum password requirements/password filters Encrypt the passwords Implement multifactor authentication Sanitize user input/parameterize queries System hardening
Explain the importance of communication during the penetration testing process.	- Communication path - Communication triggers Critical findings Stages Indicators of prior compromise - Reasons for communication Situational awareness De-escalation De-confliction - Goal reprioritization

Real comments from customers

If you cannot fully believe our PT0-002日本語 exam prep, you can refer to the real comments from our customers on our official website before making a decision. There are some real feelings after they have bought our study materials. Almost all of our customers have highly praised our PT0-002日本語 exam guide because they have successfully obtained the certificate. Generally, they are very satisfied with our PT0-002日本語 exam torrent. Also, some people will write good review guidance for reference. Maybe it is useful for your preparation of the PT0-002日本語 exam. In addition, you also can think carefully which kind of study materials suit you best. If someone leaves their phone number or email address in the comments area, you can contact them directly to get some useful suggestions.

High reliability

Customers always attach great importance to the quality of PT0-002日本語 exam torrent. We can guarantee that our study materials deserve your trustee. We have built good reputation in the market now. After about ten years'development, we have owned a perfect quality control system. All PT0-002日本語 exam prep has been inspected strictly before we sell to our customers. The inspection process is very strict and careful. Any small mistake can be tested clearly. So you can completely believe our PT0-002日本語 exam guide. What's more, all contents are designed carefully according to the exam outline. As you can see, the quality of our PT0-002日本語 exam torrent can stand up to the test. Your learning will be a pleasant process.

If you purchase our study materials to prepare the PT0-002日本語 exam, your passing rate will be much higher than others. Also, the operation of our study material is smooth and flexible and the system is stable and powerful. You can install the PT0-002日本語 exam guide on your computers, mobile phone and other electronic devices. There are no restrictions to the number equipment you install. In short, it depends on your own choice. We sincerely hope that you can enjoy the good service of our PT0-002日本語 exam prep.

Wide range of choice

Our company always lays great emphasis on offering customers more wide range of choice. Now, we have realized our promise. Our PT0-002日本語 exam guide almost covers all kinds of official test and popular certificate. So you will be able to find what you need easily on our website. Every PT0-002日本語 exam torrent is professional and accurate, which can greatly relieve your learning pressure. In the meantime, we have three versions of product packages for you. They are PDF version, windows software and online engine of the PT0-002日本語 exam prep. The three versions of the study materials packages are very popular and cost-efficient now. With the assistance of our study materials, you will escape from the pains of preparing the exam. Of course, you can purchase our PT0-002日本語 exam guide according to your own conditions. All in all, you have the right to choose freely. You will not be forced to buy the packages.

A section answering the queries about the no. of questions, time duration, passing score, and languages available for the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam

Information about the Passing Score, Duration & Questions for the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam is written in detail in the PT0-002 Dumps. Overview of that information is as follows:

Time duration: 165 minutes
Exam type: Multiple choice and Performance-based
Languages: English, Japanese
The passing score: 75%
No of questions: 85 questions

Reference: https://www.comptia.org/certifications/pentest

CompTIA PT0-002日本語 : CompTIA PenTest+ Certification (PT0-002日本語版)

About CompTIA PT0-002日本語 Exam

CompTIA PT0-002 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Planning and Scoping - 15%

Information Gathering and Vulnerability Identification - 22%

Attacks and Exploits - 30%

Penetration Testing Tools - 17%

Reporting and Communication - 16%

Real comments from customers

High reliability

Wide range of choice

A section answering the queries about the no. of questions, time duration, passing score, and languages available for the CompTIA PT0-002 Certification Exam

0 Customer ReviewsCustomers Feedback ( Some similar or old comments have been hidden.)*